### trigonometry

#### Is trigonometry computationally expensive?

I read in an article somewhere that trig calculations are generally expensive. Is this true? And if so, that's why they use trig-lookup tables right? EDIT: Hmm, so if the only thing that changes is the degrees (accurate to 1 degree), would a look up table with 360 entries (for every angle) be faster?

Expensive is a relative term. The mathematical operations that will perform fastest are those that can be performed directly by your processor. Certainly integer add and subtract will be among them. Depending upon the processor, there may be multiplication and division as well. Sometimes the processor (or a co-processor) can handle floating point operations natively. More complicated things (e.g. square root) requires a series of these low-level calculations to be performed. These things are usually accomplished using math libraries (written on top of the native operations your processor can perform). All of this happens very very fast these days, so "expensive" depends on how much of it you need to do, and how quickly you need it to happen. If you're writing real-time 3D rendering software, then you may need to use lots of clever math tricks and shortcuts to squeeze every bit of speed out of your environment. If you're working on typical business applications, odds are that the mathematical calculations you're doing won't contribute significantly to the overall performance of your system.

Since sin(), cos() and tan() are mathematical functions which are calculated by summing a series developers will sometimes use lookup tables to avoid the expensive calculation. The tradeoff is in accuracy and memory. The greater the need for accuracy, the greater the amount of memory required for the lookup table. Take a look at the following table accurate to 1 degree. http://www.analyzemath.com/trigonometry/trig_1.gif

On the Intel x86 processor, floating point addition or subtraction requires 6 clock cycles, multiplication requires 8 clock cycles, and division 30-44 clock cycles. But cosine requires between 180 and 280 clock cycles. It's still very fast, since the x86 does these things in hardware, but it's much slower than the more basic math functions.

While the quick answer is that they are more expensive than the primitive math functions (addition/multiplication/subtraction etc...) they are not -expensive- in terms of human time. Typically the reason people optimize them with look-up tables and approximations is because they are calling them potentially tens of thousands of times per second and every microsecond could be valuable. If you're writing a program and just need to call it a couple times a second the built-in functions are fast enough by far.

I would recommend writing a test program and timing them for yourself. Yes, they're slow compared to plus and minus, but they're still single processor instructions. It's unlikely to be an issue unless you're doing a very tight loop with millions of iterations.

Yes, (relative to other mathematical operations multiply, divide): if you're doing something realtime (matrix ops, video games, whatever), you can knock off lots of cycles by moving your trig calculations out of your inner loop. If you're not doing something realtime, then no, they're not expensive (relative to operations such as reading a bunch of data from disk, generating a webpage, etc.). Trig ops are hopefully done in hardware by your CPU (which can do billions of floating point operations per second).

If you always know the angles you are computing, you can store them in a variable instead of calculating them every time. This also applies within your method/function call where your angle is not going to change. You can be smart by using some formulas (calculating sin(theta) from sin(theta/2), knowing how often the values repeat - sin(theta + 2*pi*n) = sin(theta)) and reducing computation. See this wikipedia article

yes it is. trig functions are computed by summing up a series. So in general terms, it would be a lot more costly then a simple mathematical operation. same goes for sqrt

### Related Links

2 Different Radians constant calcuations whats the difference?

Trigonometry & Sunset

Calculating collisions with Radians incrementing

How do arbitrary-precision libraries like mpmath evaluate simple trigonometric functions?

How can I calculate the angle

Finding Shortest Distance Between Two Parallel Lines, With Arbitrary Point [closed]

how to convert depth in Z-cordinate

How can I simplify this expression with trigonometric in Maple?

Require trigonometry assistance with ship/wave movement

Trigonometry - Find where two curves intersect

How to calculate point 'along' unit circle radian [closed]

Issues with bullet entry points for “shoulder mounted” guns

Using the coordinates of two of a triangle's vertices to calculate the coordinates of the third

How to do the trig function Arc Cos (ACOS() in Excel) in MS-Access?

How to get the direction (angle) of rectangle after rotating it from a pivot point

How to calculate points of Chord